Boeing’s first CST-100 Starliner spacecraft on the ground at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, shortly after landing on Dec. 22, 2019.
(Image: © Bill Ingalls/NASA)
NASA has completed its investigation into Boeing’s problematic first test flight of a Starliner crew capsule as the company and agency look toward a second test flight sometime this year.
The commercial crew vehicle, which Boeing developed for NASA to ferry astronauts to and from the space station, made its orbital uncrewed debut in December, lifting off from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. But the craft failed to reach the orbiting laboratory due to a series of glitches and software issues, an independent review team found.
Earlier this year, a NASA review of the flawed test flight identified 61 “corrective actions” for Boeing to address on Starliner. On Tuesday (July 7), NASA announced that that number has swelled by another 19 corrections, for a total of 80, after a second review.
The announcement came in a teleconference update with reporters on the test flight, called Orbital Flight Test 1 (OFT-1), as Boeing prepares for a do-over mission, OFT-2, later this year.
Boeing announced in April that it will conduct a second uncrewed flight test with Starliner to demonstrate that the spacecraft is safe and reliable before any astronauts ride it to space. However, a launch date for that OFT-2 mission has not yet been set. But the flight is likely to happen “toward the latter part of this year,” Steve Stich, manager of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, said in Tuesday’s teleconference.
“Today, we’re sort of turning the page a bit from the investigation phase of OFT and moving into our hardware development,” Stich said. “The spacecraft is coming along very well.”
In February and March, NASA and Boeing revealed the results of separate investigations into two major anomalies that led to the partial failure of the OFT mission. First, Starliner’s onboard timer drew an incorrect time from the Atlas V rocket shortly after it launched, and consequently, the spacecraft didn’t execute the orbit insertion burn needed to reach the space station. The second major problem was a valve-mapping error with the software that controls Starliner’s thrusters, which could have led to an in-space collision.
NASA and Boeing announced this week that they have now also wrapped up a separate investigation into a third major anomaly, which led to a temporary drop in communications between Starliner and ground control crews during the mission’s launch. That brief glitch left mission control unable to manually command Starliner to do the orbit insertion burn after the onboard timer issue prevented it from happening automatically.
“As we started to look at the data from the flight and why we didn’t get a good forward communication link with a spacecraft, what we found was that the system perhaps allowed a little bit too big of a band of frequencies to come in to the transceiver itself,” Stitch said.
“What Boeing has done to fix that and mitigate that problem is actually installing a filter, which essentially only allows the receiver to listen to a very narrow band of frequencies with the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite,” he added. (NASA’s Tracking and Data Relay Satellites, or TDRS, allow ground controllers to communicate with spacecraft.)
While investigating the first two anomalies earlier this year, the joint NASA-Boeing review team came up with the initial list of 61 corrective actions to implement before Starliner can fly again. But with the recent completion of the investigation into the communications problem, as well as what NASA calls a “high-visibility close call” investigation, that list has now grown to 80 recommendations, Kathy Lueders, NASA’s chief of human spaceflight, said in the teleconference.
NASA and Boeing have not made the complete list of recommendations public due to concerns over releasing “proprietary data,” Leuders said. But NASA did provide a list of categories and numbers of recommendations in a statement.
Thirty-five of the recommendations pertained to process and operational improvements, 21 of them deal with testing and simulations, 17 are related to software updates and requirements and seven are in a category that includes hardware modifications and other organizational changes.
The high-visibility close call investigation was meant “to specifically review the organizational factors within NASA and Boeing that could have contributed to the flight test anomalies,” NASA officials said in the statement. “The close call investigation team, established in March, was tasked with developing recommendations that could be used to prevent similar close calls from occurring in the future.”
“NASA and Boeing have completed a tremendous amount of work reviewing the issues experienced during the uncrewed flight test of Starliner,” Steve Jurczyk, NASA’s associate administrator, said in the statement. “Ultimately, everything we’ve found will help us improve as we move forward in the development and testing of Starliner, and in our future work with commercial industry as a whole.”
Email Hanneke Weitering at firstname.lastname@example.org or follow her @hannekescience. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.