Categories
Fight Night

UFC Fight Night results, highlights: Cynthia Calvillo outpoints Jessica Eye in flyweight debut – CBSSports.com

In a division already in need of contenders for dominant champion Valentina Shevchenko, Saturday’s UFC Fight Night main event couldn’t have produced a better outcome. Cynthia Calvillo made her official debut at flyweight after moving up a weight class and decisively outworked former title contender Jessica Eye to secure a unanimous decision over five rounds (49-46, 49-46, 48-47) inside the UFC Apex facility in Las Vegas. 

The victory instantly announced Calvillo (9-1-1) as a legitimate contender at 125 pounds as she mixed clean striking with four takedowns to remain unbeaten over her last four fights. 

“I feel great, especially for putting on a performance like that with a short amount of training,” Calvillo said. “I do understand that we are going through crazy times in this world, so it feels great to be able to do this. 

“I knew that it was my first time getting ready for a five-round fight and had to do it in three weeks. I knew it was going to take me a bit to get it going and I needed that first round as a warmup.”

Can’t get enough UFC? Subscribe to our podcast State of Combat with Brian Campbell where we break down everything you need to know in the Octagon.

Eye (15-8, 1 NC), who missed weight by .25 pounds on Friday and subsequently required help walking off of the scale, appeared to control the opening round with clean counter-punching. The naturally bigger fighter as a former bantamweight, Eye quickly lost any momentum she had in Round 2 when Calvillo changed levels brilliantly to score a takedown and soon take Eye’s back in search of a choke. 

Calvillo, 32, outlanded Eye by a margin of 137 to 97 over five rounds. But it was the timing of her takedowns that turned this from a close fight to a largely dominant one as Calvillo appeared on the verge of dangerous submission attempts in three of the final four rounds, forcing Eye to fight just to survive. 

“I felt great [in the championship rounds],” Calvillo said. “I trained super hard, and when I get bored, I always try to win practice and outwork everyone. This is my first time doing that, and I’m really excited and proud of myself.”

The 33-year-old Eye, who was knocked out by Shevchenko via vicious head kick in their 2019 title bout, fell to 4-2 after moving down to flyweight. 

Following the debut win at 125 pounds, Calvillo received an instant callout on social media from former title challenger Katlyn Chookagian and expects to stay active from here on out. 

CBS Sports was with you the entire way on Saturday, updating this story with all the results and highlights. You can check out the action from UFC Fight Night: Eye vs. Calvillo below. 

UFC Fight Night: Eye vs. Calvillo results

  • Cynthia Calvillo def. Jessica Eye via unanimous decision (49-46, 49-46, 48-47)
  • Marvin Vettori def. Karl Roberson via first-round submission (rear-naked choke)
  • Charles Rosa def. Kevin Aguilar via split decision (29-28, 28-29, 29-28)
  • Andre Fili def. Charles Jourdain via split decision (29-28, 28-29, 29-28)

  • Jordan Espinosa def. Mark De La Rosa via unanimous decision (30-27, 30-27, 30-26)

  • Mariya Agapova def. Hannah Cifers via first-round submission (rear-naked choke)

  • Merab Dvalishvili def. Gustavo Lopez via unanimous decision (30-26, 30-26, 30-25)
  • Julia Avila def. Gina Mazany via first-round TKO (punches)
  • Tyson Nam def. Ryan Benoit  via first-round TKO (punches)
  • Christian Aguilera def. Anthony Ivy via first-round TKO (punches)

See New Posts

Scorecards: 49-46, 49-46, 48-47 all for Calvillo. Impressive win. Welcome to the division.

They go the distance. 49-46 for Calvillo on my card.

R5: Good takedown late from Calvillo. This has been impressive.

R5: Right hand from Eye. Calvillo continues to answer at all the right times to slow any momentum.

R5: Eye continues to come up short with punches as Calvillo steps away. Good combo inside from Calvillo. Eye is not urgent enough.

R5: Eye is flashing an uppercut for the first time but keeps getting countered with stiff jabs. Eye will need to be much busier than she currently is.

ROUND 5: Eye lets her hands go but eats a hard counter right. Swelling showing on the right eye of Eye.

I’ve got it 39-37 for Calvillo entering the final round.

R4: Good jabs from Calvillo to slow Eye down. Stiff counter from Eye. Give the round to Calvillo as the aggressor, 10-9.

R4: They trade right hands along the cage. Eye wants to counter but Calvillo won’t take the lead. Eye starts to walk her down. Nice right hand from Eye.

R4: Eye stuffs a takedown nicely. She will need to be busy late to take this round.

R4: Eye reverses nicely and gets to her feet with two minutes to go in the round.

R4: Calvillo has the hooks in and is working hard with punches to open up room for the choke.

ROUND 4: Another takedown for Calvillo and she takes Eye’s back with relative ease. Eye has a lot of time she will have to kill if she can’t break free. This is very problematic.

R3: Eye gives up her back to try and stand but Calvillo takes it and leans Eye back. She will run out of time trying a choke as Eye survives for the second straight round. 10-9, Calvillo.

R3: Nice level change leads to a takedown for Calvillo. This could secure the round for her.

R3: They trade clean punches in the center of the cage but Calvillo remains the aggressor who is throwing and landing more.

R3: Good defensive jab from Eye but Calvillo answered clean. She can catch Eye flush whenever she wants.

R3: Calvillo is starting to land clean whenever she wants. Eye is looking a bit weary as she slows down.

R3: Calvillo is really mixing up her striking. She barely misses a spinning backfist. Nice combination upstairs caught Eye flush.

ROUND 3: Calvillo opens with jabs to the body and a left hook upstairs. Eye is looking to counter from distance and she eats a leaping right from Calvillo.

R2: Eye tries to stand but Calvillo is stuck to her. Good punches from behind for Calvillo. Eye is going to try and survive the round. She does. This was all Calvillo, 10-9.

R2: Calvillo really working well on the ground. She’s staying stuck to Eye like glue and is controlling this round as Eye clings to her wrist to avoid the choke.

R2: Calvillo succeeds in applying the backpack but Eye bends over to nearly shake her off. Calvillo hangs on to the back as they grapple on the ground.

See More







Read More

Categories
Amazon's Night

Amazon’s “Vast of Night” is a Richard Linklater, sci-fi, “All the President’s Men” thriller mash-up – Salon

Brace your brains! Among May’s streaming movies is “The Vast of Night,” director Andrew Patterson’s nifty 1950s sci-fi mystery that “operates on the frequency caught between logic and myth.” That is part of what makes this film, written by James Montague and Craig W. Sanger, so compelling. It pays affectionate homage to TV shows like “The Twilight Zone” and other series of that ilk, (“Tales of Tomorrow” and “Out There”) as well as radio broadcasts from the bygone era.

The story concerns Everett (Jake Horowitz), a DJ at WOTW in Cayuga, New Mexico, and his 16-year-old friend Fay (a fantastic Sierra McCormick), a switchboard operator, encountering a strange sound on the night almost everyone in town is attending a basketball game. When Everett puts the sound on the radio, Billy (voiced by Bruce Davis) calls in to recount a story that leads the intrepid Everett and Fay to investigate further. It would spoil the delights of “The Vast of Night” to reveal more, but the film, available May 29 on Amazon, will satisfy fans of the genre as well as those who are wary of sci-fi.

Patterson shows real craft in his handling of the materials. He employs lengthy tracking shots, but also fixes his camera on Fay at the switchboard for an extended scene that is quite gripping. The film features excellent sound design, and the period language is terrific — as is the rapport between the hyperverbal Everett and Fay. 

The filmmaker chatted with Salon about his fantastic debut feature film.

Did you make tape recordings when you were a kid, and do you still have those tapes? 

If anyone has those tapes it would be my mother. And she would have kept every scrap of homework and creative endeavor I made if she could. I did have a young fascination with tape recording, and I remember having one in the 1980s. I’d steal chunks of songs off the radio, like every kid. When you realize you can do that, it’s a pretty neat power. I don’t know that I did anything creative on those tapes, but it was a part of my life when I was 5, 6, 7 years old. 

This film is both nostalgic and original. What can you say about the 1950s radio and TV influences?  

The biggest ones by far were the movies and the media that played on people’s fears and curiosities. “The Twilight Zone” did that better than anything. It’s the 20th-century TV equivalent to a 19th-century novel like “Moby Dick.” It has that much power and strength. Every time something dates, you tend to devalue it because we expect something new and shiny every week, but “The Twilight Zone” is an unbelievable milestone because it’s uncanny and it had this strange TV limitation. They made up miniatures and shot on a backlot and had these scripts that were not afraid to end on ambiguity or tragedy. They had these restraints, and that’s what we leaned into for “The Vast of Night” along with radio dramas of the 1930s and 1940s. There’s a “Third Man,” radio show with Orson Welles [reprising] Harry Lime. A lot of movies from the 1940s got turned into radio drama. “Key Largo” had a great 1-hour radio version with the lead actors from the movie. That was a big influence — those movies of the 1940s that were turned into radio shows. We wanted our film to feel like late ’40s radio drama.

The film is all about storytelling — recording one’s own voice, Billy’s story, which Everett says is “good news” for the radio, the gossip about a family, or the tale of a squirrel eating the wire at the gym, and especially Mabel Blanche’s (Gail Cronauer) recitation of her life. What makes a good story and how do you tell it well?

I think with a good story you have a question in the back of your mind and the storyteller knows how to create an irresolution or imbalance that you are waiting to experience. That can be verbal, or visual, or physics playing out — something is on the edge of a table that might fall off. Until you resolve it, people usually lean in and are transfixed. The stories in “The Vast of Night” are things that you are familiar with, or relate to, but the longer stories in the film have an imbalance or irresolution that you’re waiting, as a listener or viewer, to come to a resolution in a satisfying way. In a movie, you can string these stories together for 90 minutes in a way that continues to be engaging. It [depends on] how much you care about the characters telling them. I enjoy hearing stories told, so I wanted our characters to explain their side of things and do it without anybody rushing them.

Can you talk about the sound design and how you used voices?

I learned that from two pretty pivotal movies, and one steals a lot from the former. “All the President’s Men” — if you watch that film, there are wonderful mysteries on the other side of the phone calls. There’s an early scene where Robert Redford starts to unravel really important information and at the same time there is office activity happening over his shoulder. We are locked in on him looking and curiosity jotting down notes during that pursuit [of information]. It is effective. “Zodiac,” 30 years later, is an homage to that. In the middle of that film, a caller holds the movie hostage by calling into TV program. We borrowed that template, and that’s where that inspiration came from.

I’m curious to hear your thoughts about the power of a disembodied voice.

I don’t know that I have an answer to that. 

What about your visual approach to the film? The palette is almost black and white; there are static scenes, times where the screen fades to black, and the camerawork includes some marvelous long tracking shots as well as fixed frames. How did you conceive of the film visually? 

The color palette was to show how small towns look at night. Browns and greens with only one instance of red at the radio station. Everett is all blue and silver so he’s cold, and Faye is green and gold, so she’s warm. We didn’t want characters under perfect pools of light. We wanted the characters soft and on the edge. With the visual language, I tried to stay away from anything that would date the film in 10-20 years. The violators are the way you light, edit, and the ways the performers behave and act. They have different styles and approaches so we tried to unstick them in time so the film would look lovely and present and new in 2025 and in 2045. We also tried to do something that didn’t require a lot of editing and punchiness to work. But we had to go back to the script to confirm we could have a 5-minute take rather than 30 shots back and forth. We had a handful of distinct scenes that would play out in 3, 4, or 10 minutes in one case. We tried to make it feel a bit more like a play. We tried to build drama in scenes where you watch Everett thread a reel to reel tape over again or Fay working a switchboard. 

Can you discuss incorporating the film’s themes about race, the soviets, the government, surveillance and conformity, and free will?

We lean into heavily the idea of paranoia at the time, and the Red Scare and Communists take over the country and take over the government. We wanted to play up the possibility of that as an alternate narrative to what was going on over the airwaves. It’s a ripe period to have the characters ask and pose things that we could play with without having it take over the movie. The game plan was to ask a lot of questions. With something like race — and I’ve never written or worked on anything that had a minority character — I wanted to have a black character stop the movie for 15 minutes. The two characters, Fay and Everett, are on the forefront of civil rights, so they would listen to someone like Billy, whereas their parents might not. 

You capture the rhythm of the characters’ fast-talking dialogue, the language of the period and even the mindset of a small town. Can you describe how you found the tone for the film? It’s affectionate, and it comes right up to the line without ever being “wink wink.”

We wanted it to feel exciting because anything new in someone’s life that is not violent, or threatening, is filled with wonder and mystery and possibility. We wanted that to be the tone of the movie until that is no longer the case. Driving 90 miles per hour down the highway is thrilling until it goes wrong. We wanted to latch on to the future possibility. That’s how we scored the film. The first two thirds don’t have that wonder. Ideally, the tone changes. One tone begins the movie and a different tone ends the film. I check out of films with only one tone, especially if it’s dread all the way through. 

You limit the special effects and have incredible period design for a low budget. Can you talk about that?

Low budget was true for us. We knew where to put our money. We painted out satellite dishes on buildings, and painting over signs on buildings, and there are the third act visual effects. The team I hired was from Argentina — Rodrigo Tomasso and Marcelo García — who worked on Juan José Campanella’s “The Secret in Their Eyes.” Our colorist and effects guys were all down there in Buenos Aires. I saved 80% of the budget using them. I flew them up, and they scouted and delivered my vision. They were my earliest collaborators. Our production design was headed by Adam Dietrich. A lot of the look was me being the beneficiary of their work.

There is an amusing bit where Fay recounts magazine stories about the future involving electric cars, vacuum tube transportation, and even personalized phones. Your film is set in the past, but what do you think about technology and the time period? 

It’s hilarious, because it’s just like that today. If you subscribe to “Popular Science” and “Modern Mechanics,” you see things that seem impossible that they would exist. It was like that in 1955, 1956, and 1957. Our film is set in 1958, and it’s all hyperbolic. No one predicted the internet. It was all about home appliances, transportation, and communication. Each one of those articles are 100% real. We stole them and found an organic way to get them in the movie and give a sense of Fay.

I like how the film almost boxes the characters into a corner but provides an elegant way out. How did you appeal to sci-fi fans and non-fans? 

I don’t run to watch a sci-fi film. I run to watch human drama. I’m fascinated by people talking, and dramas where each person is connected to someone else by a desire for that person or what they want from that person. That’s a stage play way to write. I wanted to do that here and have it smash into a world we all knew. Richard Linklater [mashed up] with a sci-fi/”All the President’s Men” thriller. I’d not seen that done. I wanted a human drama blindsided by a sci-fi plot. The characters in monster and alien movies are often whittled down to one or two feelings. I wanted witty, humbled, scared, and excited characters. And that’s what wonderful novels and stories do. I was trying to bridge a world you don’t get to see. 

“The Vast of Night” is currently available to stream on Amazon. 


Read More