Samsung Should

Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ in 2020? – PhoneArena

Should you buy the

Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ in mid-2020 when the Galaxy Note 20 is just weeks’ away from becoming reality? 


Galaxy Note 20 is just around the corner and it’s quite the promising device: a Galaxy S20 Ultra-like camera system with a superb hardware setup and the ubiquitous S Pen stylus on deck. But… isn’t last year’s

Galaxy Note 10+ still a promising device? I’ve been using it on and off for a couple of months and can finally provide an answer to this question. I admit that I was pretty skeptical towards the Note 10+ back in 2019, when I expressed my controversial opinion that it was a downgrade in comparison with the Galaxy Note 9, but after I used it for a month or so, my view changed and I fell for the phone. Not literally, of course.

Should you get the Galaxy Note 10+ in 2020?

Getting a Note 10+ in 2020 is definitely not a dumb move, on the contrary – this Samsung flagship still feels as fresh as the day it was announced. Surprisingly, I like it much more than the current Galaxy S20-series and not only because of the S Pen; the sleek overall design, the large display, and standout suite of Galaxy Note features made an excellent phone. The Galaxy Note 10+ indicated a paradigm shift for Samsung as it was its first modern phone to drop the headphone jack and the first Note device that finally embraced the bezel-less trend. It was also the first Galaxy Note phone that strayed away from the strict business design language and spiced things up in the exterior with vivid colors and shapes, making it a device that broke away from its family legacy just as much as it tried to stay true to its identity. 

Galaxy Note 10+: The good stuff

The Note 10+ has aged like a fine wine. True, it’s technically not even a year old, but in the mobile market, such a window of time can be perceived as eternity in the sense of technology improvement. Yet, I can’t say the Note 10+ is lacking in any department.

Performance-wise, the phone still feels pretty much excelling in any task that you throw at it, and that’s… hardly surprising. There’s a chance that you are an Android power-user if you’re using the Note 10+ or at least considering getting one, so rest assured that the phone can keep up with your demanding requirements as a user. I’d know, since I like to regard myself as a power-user, just like you. I have often found myself watching a picture-in-picture video while multitasking in split screen mode, and while that’s an extremely niche thing to do, I have never felt like I’m stretching the Note 10+’s capabilities thin. On the contrary, it always feels more than ready to be used and abused; if it could talk, it’d probably scream “Spank me, daddy!”

The display is another aspect of the Note 10+ that has aged well. The colors? Excellent! The maximum brightness under the sun? Great as well! “But… It doesn’t have a high-refresh rate display, “ some of you may say. True, it doesn’t have a 90 or a 120Hz display, which are all the rage these days, but seeing how the Galaxy S20-series implemented this feature rather poorly, I’m more than glad Samsung didn’t ‘ruin‘ the Note 10+ as well. As a reminder, the Galaxy S20, S20 Plus, and S20 Ultra all come with 120Hz displays, but the power draw in this display was significantly higher, leading to a pretty drastic 33% reduction in battery life. That’s not cool, especially when you consider the fact that the 120Hz display was one of the often highlighted new features of Samsung’s flagships. There’s still room for improvement, it seems, and I hope that the Note 20 does a better job at juggling between a smooth display experience and adequate battery life.

Buy Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ on:

Galaxy Note 10+: The OK stuff

Speaking of battery life, Samsung flagships have always prioritized features over long endurance. You’ll rarely see a Samsung phone excel in the battery department if you enjoy all of its features, and that’s okay. That’s actually valid for most phones out there. However, I feel the Note 10+ would have really shone if it had a slightly larger battery at the expense of a slightly thicker body, as it would have made a great phone even better. These days, if I use the Note 10+ like I really want to and don’t care that much about power conservation, it would last me a day, not more. Sometimes, if I really push things hard and use it a lot in the mornings, I’d have to top it up around 3 or 4pm if I want to have any juice left by the evening. That’s not great, but you get used to it and adapt accordingly. There are many phones with better battery life, but many of them can’t match the same feature set as the Note 10+, and that kind of makes up for the good, but not great battery life.

The biometrics are another just-okay aspect of the phone. It has an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor that’s not as fast as the optical ones and it definitely feels slower than many other devices with such scanners embedded into their displays. The accuracy is a bit iffy as well: on the average, 2 or 3 out 10 fingerprint unlocks will require a second attempt, which is definitely a nuisance. Of course, nobody’s forcing you to use the embedded fingerprint scanner! You can use the face unlock feature… which only works as intended half the time. It’s not a 3D solution so it uses the selfie camera, making it slow, not very safe, and not working well when you are wearing any extra apparel or in a position that the face unlock doesn’t really like.

Galaxy Note 10+: The not-so-good stuff

Generally speaking, there There isn’t much to dislike about the phone, but there are several things that drive me crazy.

For example, I’ve had near constant Wi-Fi connectivity issues. Some days, it would go into “Network unavailable” mode every 15 minutes or so, and no logical fix worked. For all I know, the Note 10+ dislikes my home router, though I’ve hardly ever had such problems with any other phone I’ve ever used in the house. This is most certainly an isolated case with my specific setup, so don’t read too much into it. Speak up if you’ve ever encountered similar issues on your Note 10+ though.

Another aspect of the phone that I’m less than enamored with is the measly 2X telephoto zoom camera. Granted, it produces great images, but feels slightly lacking in comparison with most other zoom phones out there that come with either 3X or 5X telephoto zooms. I’d say that if you decide to go the zoom way, go all the way in and leave those pesky 2X telephoto camera in the past where they belong. I can zoom that much digitally without a significant loss of quality, so a 3X or longer lens would have made me love the Galaxy Note 10+ more.

The case for buying a Note 10+ in 2020

Now that we’ve weighed and tried the Galaxy Note 10+, are we finally ready to answer the question that was asked at the beginning of the article? Should you buy one now, in mid-2020?

If for some reason you don’t need a 5G phone, like me, then the Note 10+ will do you good for the foreseeable future. Some may say the regular Note 10+ is not future-proof due to the lack of 5G support, but that’s absolutely no deal-breaker for me and probably many of you. In case you don’t need a camera with a crazy telephoto zoom, then the Note 10+ would suffice in the imaging department. Moreover, the sleek design of the Note 10+ will hardly ever be repeated; phones are getting thicker and heavier thanks to the larger batteries fitted inside. I’m all for a larger battery, but there’s something inherently appealing to the Note 10+’s exhilarating design.

Buy Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ on:

Read More

Coronavirus Should

Should I get a coronavirus antibody test? Experts explain what we know so far – CBS News

The Food and Drug Administration has granted emergency authorization to a dozen coronavirus antibody tests, and more than 200 others are currently on the market. One authorized company, Roche, claims its test is 100% accurate at finding coronavirus antibodies in the blood and 99.8% accurate at ruling them out. 

Many people who got sick in recent months but didn’t get tested for COVID-19 have been left wondering whether they had the coronavirus. Many others who didn’t get sick could have also been infected with the virus and not even known it. People in both groups are now looking to antibody tests for possible answers. 

What are antibodies? And how accurate are the tests?

Antibodies are proteins the body makes to attack a virus. If somebody has a certain antibody it could mean that they were infected in the past — whether they knew it or not. Dr. Shoshana Ungerleider, an internal medicine physician at Sutter Health in San Francisco told CBSN that having specific antibodies “means you’ve been exposed to that virus, or you’ve had a vaccine for it.” 

However, according to CBS News medical contributor Dr. David Agus, many antibody tests on the market right now are “advertising claims that make no sense.” He said that too little is known about the coronavirus to rely on the results of most of the current antibody tests.

Tests with higher rates of false positive results could mistakenly lead people to believe they have antibodies when they really don’t. False negatives could lead people to believe they don’t have antibodies when they actually do.

“Aside from this latest FDA-approved antibody test that we’re hearing about that is highly accurate, I should also point out that we don’t even know if most of the other hundred or so tests that are out there on the market are even close to being that accurate,” Underleider said.

The FDA on Monday said it will start requiring companies making coronavirus antibody tests to apply for authorization by the agency within 10 days of releasing their products. 

“We unfortunately see unscrupulous actors marketing fraudulent test kits and using the pandemic as an opportunity to take advantage of Americans’ anxiety,” the FDA said in a statement.

Do antibodies mean you’re immune?

Even if a test can accurately detect antibodies, Agus said people who carry them cannot rest assured they are safe from the virus. That’s because having the antibody does not necessarily mean you are immune to the virus. 

According to Agus, the body creates many antibodies to fight infection, but not all those antibodies will neutralize the virus — some simply “hang on,” he said. “Until we have the immunity component, for the individual person (an antibody test) doesn’t make sense.”

New coronavirus antibody test claims higher accuracy

Agus said cities and companies could use an antibody test to see who has been exposed to the virus in the past, but would not be able to know who is safe from it. 

He said the next step is to take existing tests and add in an “immunity component” — but when that could be ready is unknown.  

White House coronavirus response coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx told CBS News’ Margaret Brennan on April 19 that having the virus and having immunity are two “different question(s).” She said research is underway to determine if the antibodies offer protection. 

“That’s why these studies that are going on with plasma and giving plasma to sick patients to really see if that antibody confers protective immunity and help to the individual who is sick, as well as really doing studies with vaccines and looking, seeing whether the antibodies that are produced are effective,” Birx said. 

“These are questions that we still have scientifically. I will tell you, in most infectious diseases, except for HIV, we know that when you get sick and you recover and you develop antibodies, that that antibody is often confers immunity. We just don’t know if it’s immunity for a month, immunity for six months, immunity for six years,” she said.

Dr. Ungerleider said “we shouldn’t get ahead of ourselves” with antibody testing. “I think that the fact remains that we don’t know yet how long these antibodies last, the degree to which people with coronavirus antibodies are actually protected from getting COVID a second or a third time.” 

“We should all remember that the novel coronavirus is only 16 weeks old. So there’s a lot we just don’t know yet,” she said.

Kate Gibson contributed reporting.

Read More