Sorry Twitter

Twitter: Sorry for Putting Covid-19 Misinformation Labels on Your ‘Oxygen’ Tweets – Gizmodo

To reign in false claims about covid-19, Twitter put misinformation labels on tweets with the words “5G” and “oxygen” this week.

To reign in false claims about covid-19, Twitter put misinformation labels on tweets with the words “5G” and “oxygen” this week.
Photo: Alastair Pike (AFP via Getty Images)

It’s not always easy to do the right thing in tech, and it can lead to some embarrassing (and funny) mistakes. Just ask Twitter.

As you all probably know, Twitter has been trying to stop misinformation about covid-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus, from spreading wildly on its platform. One way it does this is by sticking misinformation labels on tweets with false information about covid-19, such as posts talking about a cure for the disease (there is unfortunately no cure yet although scientists all over the world are working on a vaccine).

In recent weeks, Twitter has begun adding these labels to tweets that link the rollout of 5G to the spread of covid-19, a topic that has prompted multiple conspiracy theories. Some conspiracy theorists, for example, claim that radiation from 5G towers weakens immune systems and makes people more susceptible to getting covid-19. There is no scientific evidence to support this. However, misinformation about 5G towers has led people to burn cellphone towers in the UK.

Flagging tweets that spit out 5G coronavirus conspiracy theories sounds like a good thing, right? No doubt about that, except when the filtering system you use gets confused.

G/O Media may get a commission

Many Twitter users noticed on Friday that Twitter was apparently sticking labels on any tweet that mentioned “5G,” “oxygen,” and “frequency” for some strange reason, even if those tweets were not about harmful 5G conspiracy theories. The label links to a Twitter Moment titled “No, 5G isn’t causing coronavirus,” and includes information from reputable sources debunking the claims.

The end result, of course, was Twitter users posting endless combinations with the words to see if their tweets would get flagged. These types of tweets were obviously not meant to be harmful and were just an attempt to have fun, but Twitter’s filter didn’t have a way of knowing that.

When it comes to why Twitter singled out “oxygen” and “frequency,” the folks at The Week theorize that it’s probably because of a conspiracy theory that claims that 5G is a dangerous frequency that sucks the oxygen out of the atmosphere, thereby disrupting our bodies’ normal functions. This is, of course, false. Twitter hasn’t confirmed that this is the reason why its system started flagging the tweets.

Nonetheless, it’s important to note that this type of “moderation by algorithm” can lead to other issues.

“One of the flaws of attempting moderation at scale by algorithm, a problem that has no bearing on 5G, is that it lets tech companies suck the oxygen out of efforts at reform & regulation, as they shrug & turn ‘we tried one thing with code and it did not work’ into ‘can’t be done,’” defense technology writer Kelsey D. Atherton pointed out in a tweet, which also got slapped with a covid-19 misinformation label.

As the day went on, Twitter eventually stopped labeling the tweets with the keywords we mentioned. A Twitter spokesperson told Motherboard this weekend that the company’s algorithm is “imperfect and constantly changing” based on what’s happening on Twitter. The spokeswoman added that Twitter prioritized over-labeling to err on the side of caution and reduce harm while providing the necessary context.

“In the last few weeks, you may have seen tweets with labels linking to additional info about covid-19. Not all of those tweets had potentially misleading content associating covid-19 and 5G. We apologize for any confusion and we’re working to improve our labeling process,” Twitter Support tweeted on Saturday. “As we improve this process to be more precise, our goal is to show fewer la
Read More

Sorry Superfans

Sorry, Superfans: Parks and Rec ’s Socially Distanced Reunion Didn’t Work – Yahoo News

NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE I s it okay to pan a much-awaited sitcom reunion that was put together for charity, that had to be filmed in a very awkward fashion to comply with social-distancing requirements, and that everyone else, critics and fans alike, seemed to love? Because that’s what I’m about to do.

Now, to be fair, there are different types of Parks and Recreation fans, and I might have been a little less primed than others to enjoy what the creators put together for Thursday. Lots of people adore the show’s big, goofy heart. But me, I loved the wicked cynical streak Parks had during the first half of its run, and while I stuck with it through all seven seasons, I wasn’t too sad to see it go by the end. Moreover, I’ve never quite forgiven Parks for killing off Party Down, another of my favorite comedies, by poaching its lead actor back in 2010.

Thursday’s pointless half-hour lead-in, a documentary in which the actors blathered on about how much they like each other, didn’t help build any anticipation. And by the time 9 p.m. rolled around and the new episode was over, I understood something Larry David once said on Curb Your Enthusiasm: “You know those reunion shows, they’re so lame, really. They never work. The actors are 10 years older. It doesn’t look right.”

Nothing about the new episode worked.

The entire concept made no sense. Five years after the show ended, the employees of the Pawnee Parks and Recreation Department are former employees and scattered all over the place. Leslie Knope works for the Department of the Interior; her husband, the guy who should have stayed on Party Down, is a congressman; Jerry Gergich is mayor; Ann Perkins is volunteering as a nurse in Michigan; Ron Swanson is holed up in a cabin; etc. And yet they’re apparently all still close friends, and Knope has set up a system where they check up on each other daily during the COVID crisis through a “phone tree,” not by simply calling or texting each other but by chatting face-to-face online.

Obviously the writers were working under some demanding constraints. The final season of Parks dictated the future of each of the characters, ruling out an episode where they all still work together, and COVID-19 made it impossible for them to get together in person. But sitcoms work best when they feel natural, and there’s nothing natural about this incredibly contrived situation.

This isn’t a group of government employees goofing off on the job, struggling against the stupidity of both the state and the public while trying to handle piddly local-government tasks, and indulging their hilarious personal foibles. It’s a group of people who worked together years ago and are now talking online for no real reason at all.

The actors’ chemistry seemed thrown off as well. This is a cast that gelled on screen for more than half a decade. Judging by that gushy lead-in show, the rapport wasn’t all an act. Yet here the members of the cast, each in his own room away from everyone else, couldn’t seem to make a conversation feel normal. It felt like they were just sitting there saying lines at each other.

The jokes? People weighing in on the episode via social media seemed to love ’em. But I didn’t laugh out loud once; everything was either a self-conscious nod toward a recurring gag (everyone hates Jerry! Andy’s so stupid! Tom and his crazy inventions!) or simply not that funny (Jerry clicked the wrong Zoom button and now he looks like a dog!). I was impressed by how many side characters they managed to work into a single time slot — Paul Rudd kicks off the episode as Bobby Newport; news anchors Perd Hapley and Joan Callamezzo each interview Knope and her husband; Swanson’s ex-wife shows up at the cabin — but nothing rekindled the old magic.

Again: I’m a certain type of Parks fan. To me, rekindling the magic would mean a trip back to 2011, not 2015. If you enjoyed the show’s dorkier later years and missed the reunion, by all means stream it when you can. And much respect to everyone involved with the show for pitching in to raise money for charity. The show and some sponsors are matching donations to Feeding America and you can contribute here.

But I can’t lie. The episode didn’t do it for me.

More from National Review

Read More